The FloTrac system automatically updates advanced parameters every 20 seconds, reflecting rapid physical changes in moderate to high-risk surgery. Advanced hemodynamic parameters provided by the FloTrac sensor offer you continuous insight to more accurately determine your patient’s fluid status. The minimally-invasive FloTrac sensor connects to any existing arterial catheter.
An integrated hemodynamic monitoring system
The FloTrac sensor integrates with the Edwards EV1000 clinical platform to show patient status at a glance, for visual clinical support and increased clarity in volume administration during moderate-high-risk surgical procedures.
|Model||Description||Length||Unit of Measure|
|MHD8||FloTrac sensor||84 in / 213 cm||EA|
|MHD85||FloTrac sensor||84 in / 213 cm||5 EA|
|MHD6||FloTrac sensor||60 in / 152 cm||EA|
|MHD65||FloTrac sensor||60 in / 152 cm||5 EA|
|MHD6AZ||FloTrac sensor with VAMP adult system||60 in / 152 cm||EA|
|MHD6AZ5||FloTrac sensor with VAMP adult system||60 in / 152 cm||5 EA|
EV1000 clinical platform
|EVPB1||Power Adaptor Bracket|
|EVPSA110||Power Adaptor, 110V|
|EVPSA110L||Power Adaptor, 110V - 15 Feet|
|EVPSB110||Power Adaptor, 110V|
|EVPSB110L||Power Adaptor, 110V - 15 Feet|
|EVPSB220||Power Adaptor, 220V|
|EVPSB220L||Power Adaptor, 220V - 15 Feet|
- Stroke volume optimization (SV) 4–12
Stroke volume measurement with the FloTrac system* enables an individualized approach for administering fluid until SV reaches a plateau on the Frank-Starling curve, to help prevent hypovolemia and excessive fluid administration.
- Stroke volume variation optimization (SVV) 13
For control-ventilated patients, SVV has proved to be a highly sensitive and specific indicator for preload responsiveness, serving as an accurate marker of patient status on the Frank-Starling curve.
- Oxygen delivery optimization (DO 2 with CCO) 14
Continuous cardiac output (CCO) measured by the FloTrac system can be used (in combination with SaO 2 and hemoglobin) to monitor and optimize DO 2 with fluid (including red blood cells) and inotropic agents.
Hemodynamic education empowering clinical advancement
With a long-term commitment to improving the quality of care for surgical and critical care patients through education, Edwards Clinical Education meets you no matter where you are in the learning process — with a continuum of resources and tools that continuously support you as you solve the clinical challenges facing you today, and in the future.
Compatible monitoring platform
FloTrac system setup video
This video reviews the steps required to set up and operate the EV1000 clinical platform with FloTrac allowing their patients’ blood pressure and cardiac output to be monitored continuously from a minimally invasive catheter.
The Edwards Advantage
We are committed to providing your institution, clinicians and staff with the highest levels of customer service and support to ensure seamless product implementation and ongoing use, including:
- 24/7 technical support – Simply call 800-822-9837 anytime, day or night
- Customer service – Call 800-424-3278 to speak to a customer service representative
Contact a sales representative
- Marik & Cavallazzi. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013
- Le Manach et al. Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac output during volume expansion in the perioperative period? Anesthesiology 2013
- Bennett D. Arterial Pressure: A Personal View. Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005. ISBN: 3-540-22349-5
- Cecconi M, Fasano N, Langiano N, et al. Goal directed haemodynamic therapy during elective total hip arthroplasty under regional anaesthesia. Crit Care. 2011;15:R132
- Sinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimization and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. AMJ. 1997;315:909–912.
- Gan T, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(4):820–826.
- Venn R, Richardson P, Poloniecki J, Grounds M, Newman P. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(1):65–71.
- Conway D, Mayall R, Abdul-Latif M, Gilligan S, Tackaberry C. Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(9):845–849.
- McKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, Caudwell L, Brady A, Singer M. Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery. BMJ. 2004;329:358.
- Wakeling H, McFall M, Jenkins C, Woods W, Barclay G, Fleming S. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(5):634–642
- Noblett S, Snowden C, Shenton B, Horgan A. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. BJS. 2006;93(9):1069–1076.
- ChytraI, Pradl R, Bosman R, Pelnar P, Kasal E, Zidkova A. Esophageal Doppler-guided fluid management decreases blood lactate levels in multiple-trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007;11:R24.
- Benes J, ChytraI, Altmann P, et al. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care. 2010;14:1-15.
- Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser JC, Orsetti G, Munch C, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Pietropaoli P. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 2007;132:1817–1824.
- Michard F., Changes in Arterial Pressure during Mechanical Ventilation, Anesthesiology, 2005.
- Bellamy, MC. Wet, dry or something else? B J Anaestha. 2006; 97(6): 755–757