Pericardial Heart Valves
Magna Ease Aortic Valve
Magna Mitral Ease Valve
Magna Aortic Valve
Magna Mitral Valve
Theon Mitral System
PERIMOUNT Aortic
PERIMOUNT Mitral
Related Products
Valve Repair Rings
PORT ACCESS Systems
Other Tissue Valves
Cannulae
Cardiac Surgery
Why Compromise with Lifelong Anticoagulation
Brochure
Durability
Reoperation
Cumulative Risks
Atrial Fibrillation
Comorbidities
INR Management
Patient Website
Heart Basics
Treatment Options
Product Information
Patient Stories
Request Information
Technical Information
Cardiovascular Surgery FAQ
Temperature Guidelines
MRI Safety
Heart Valve News
Report from NPR
2006 ACC / AHA Guidelines
Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT
Magna Mitral Ease Heart Valve
Where MAGNA performance meets MITRAL EASE of implant.
The Magna Mitral Ease valve offers outstanding performance and durability. With the addition of significant design enhancements for better access, placement, and suturing, Magna Mitral Ease valve provides performance you can count on to ease the challenges of mitral valve replacement.
Enhanced Mitral Implantability
Color-coded valve holder confirms implant readiness
Asymmetric design to position the posterior strut away from LV wall
Supra-annular position to reduce the risk of LVOTO and ventricular injury
Ultra-low profile valve optimizes outflow hemodynamics and physiologic flow
Built on Proven Performance
Outperforming mitral pericardial design in challenging and standard age groups
1
Study after study, consistently demonstrates long-term endurance of Edwards mitral pericardial design
1-7
References
1. Jamieson, WRE, et al. Structural Valve Deterioration in Mitral Replacement Surgery: Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards Supra-Annular Porcine and PERIMOUNT Pericardial Bioprostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Aug;118:297-305. (Freedom from explant due to structural valve deterioration)
2. Aupart, MR, et al. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves in the mitral position: ten-year follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Mar;113(3):492-8. (Freedom from structural deterioration)
3. Murakami, T, et al. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results. J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Jan;5(1):45-9. (Freedom from structural deterioration)
4. Poirier, NC, et al. 15-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:S57-61. (Freedom from structural deterioration)
5. Neville, PH, et al. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic or mitral position: a 12-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(6 Suppl):S143-7. (Freedom from structural deterioration)
6. Marchand, MA, et al. Fifteen-year experience with the mitral Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 May;71(5 Suppl):S236-9. (Freedom from explant due to structural valve deterioration)
7. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis 16-year results. Data on file at Edwards Lifesciences, 2003. (Freedom from explant due to structural valve deterioration)
For professional use. See instructions for use for full prescribing information, including indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions and adverse events.
Edwards Lifesciences devices placed on the European market meeting the essential requirements referred to in Article 3 of the Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC bear the CE marking of conformity.
Animation
Enhanced Implantability
Implantation Guide
Specifications
Models
Accessories
Contact Us
|
Legal Terms
|
Privacy Policy
| © 2012 Edwards Lifesciences LLC. All rights reserved.